Comments on: The Sherpa’s Crystal Ball - Take 1 (2/19/08) http://fantasybaseballsherpa.com/blog/2008/02/19/the-sherpas-crystal-ball-take-1-21908/ Guiding You to Victory!!! Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:58:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: The Sherpa http://fantasybaseballsherpa.com/blog/2008/02/19/the-sherpas-crystal-ball-take-1-21908/#comment-5 The Sherpa Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:27:37 +0000 http://fantasybaseballsherpa.com/blog/2008/02/19/the-sherpas-crystal-ball-take-1-21908/#comment-5 Hey Paul, thanks for the link to Derek Carty's article in The Hardball Times - it's quite good. I recently did a similar study and came to a similar conclusion - if you look at historical data, there isn't a strong correlation between the number of games a team wins and the number of save opportunities a team generates. Random variation has something to do with this - in a given season, some teams just happen to play a lot more close games resulting in save opportunities than other teams do. So does the way a manager uses his Closer (i.e. - will he use his Closer 2-3 days in a row in save situations?) So does a manager's patience with his Closer, which depends on both the Closer's track record (or lack thereof) and whether the team is currently in the pennant race or not. However, for the purpose of putting together a series of projections, you have to assume that teams that win more games will generate more save opportunities. I'll explain my line of thinking in making the statement about differences in Run Support and the impact on the number of saves for a Closer. Over the last 3 seasons (2005-07) saves have been recorded in approximately 50% of all games. The difference in my 2008 projections between the maximum number of team wins (94 for both the Angels and the Yankees) and the minimum number of team wins (69 for the Nationals) is 25. If I apply the 50% estimate, that would result in a projected 12-13 save difference between the Closers for the Angels and Yankees vs. the Closer for the Nationals, assuming of course that all three stay healthy for the majority of the year. According to my projections there are 15 pairs of teams that will be separated by at least 20 wins this season; thus my statement about the 10-save difference. Admittedly, this is more art than science, but it's a valid assumption for the purpose of preparing a set of projections. Chad Cordero would be much higher in my rankings if he were the Closer for the Angels, Yankees, etc, while Francisco Rodriguez and Mariano Rivera would be much lower in my rankings if they were the Closer for the Nationals. Hey Paul, thanks for the link to Derek Carty’s article in The Hardball Times - it’s quite good. I recently did a similar study and came to a similar conclusion - if you look at historical data, there isn’t a strong correlation between the number of games a team wins and the number of save opportunities a team generates. Random variation has something to do with this - in a given season, some teams just happen to play a lot more close games resulting in save opportunities than other teams do. So does the way a manager uses his Closer (i.e. - will he use his Closer 2-3 days in a row in save situations?) So does a manager’s patience with his Closer, which depends on both the Closer’s track record (or lack thereof) and whether the team is currently in the pennant race or not.

However, for the purpose of putting together a series of projections, you have to assume that teams that win more games will generate more save opportunities. I’ll explain my line of thinking in making the statement about differences in Run Support and the impact on the number of saves for a Closer. Over the last 3 seasons (2005-07) saves have been recorded in approximately 50% of all games. The difference in my 2008 projections between the maximum number of team wins (94 for both the Angels and the Yankees) and the minimum number of team wins (69 for the Nationals) is 25.

If I apply the 50% estimate, that would result in a projected 12-13 save difference between the Closers for the Angels and Yankees vs. the Closer for the Nationals, assuming of course that all three stay healthy for the majority of the year. According to my projections there are 15 pairs of teams that will be separated by at least 20 wins this season; thus my statement about the 10-save difference.

Admittedly, this is more art than science, but it’s a valid assumption for the purpose of preparing a set of projections. Chad Cordero would be much higher in my rankings if he were the Closer for the Angels, Yankees, etc, while Francisco Rodriguez and Mariano Rivera would be much lower in my rankings if they were the Closer for the Nationals.

]]> By: Paul http://fantasybaseballsherpa.com/blog/2008/02/19/the-sherpas-crystal-ball-take-1-21908/#comment-3 Paul Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:44:58 +0000 http://fantasybaseballsherpa.com/blog/2008/02/19/the-sherpas-crystal-ball-take-1-21908/#comment-3 Hi Sherpa, I recently found your site (through MDC if our interested) and was instantly turned off by a statement you made regarding run support, "The run support a team’s Hitters give their Pitchers can easily make a difference of 2-3 Wins for a Starting Pitcher and 10 Saves for a Closer." I'm not complaining about the 2-3 wins for a starting pitcher as I have not yet analyzed the data. However 10 saves for a closer! That's rediculous! Might I direct your attention this way: http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/fantasy/article/are-saves-predictable/ They make the point for me. Paul Hi Sherpa,

I recently found your site (through MDC if our interested) and was instantly turned off by a statement you made regarding run support, “The run support a team’s Hitters give their Pitchers can easily make a difference of 2-3 Wins for a Starting Pitcher and 10 Saves for a Closer.”

I’m not complaining about the 2-3 wins for a starting pitcher as I have not yet analyzed the data. However 10 saves for a closer! That’s rediculous! Might I direct your attention this way: http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/fantasy/article/are-saves-predictable/

They make the point for me.

Paul

]]>